Appellate justices have seen just about everything when it comes to bizarre facts in court cases, but every once in a while even they come across a jaw-dropper. That’s how it was last week, when a California appeals court agreed to set aside a settlement in a divorce case in which two justices felt an unnamed attorney appeared to act as a “double agent.” Justice David Sills wrote, “the husband’s attorney literally palmed himself off to the trial court as the wife’s attorney.”
Popularity: 3% [?]
Posted on Monday, October 2nd, 2006. Filed under: Law Misc, Litigation
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Rate This Post - Vote Now!