Class action plaintiffs failed to timely seek interlocutory appeal of district court order denying certification of subclass claims; in particular, plaintiffs failed to apply for leave to appeal under FRCP 23(f) until after district court ruled on renewed motions for certification, but orders denying renewed motions neither granted nor denied class certification, and thus deadline for interlocutory appeal expired ten days after original ruling.
Popularity: 2% [?]
Posted on Tuesday, September 12th, 2006. Filed under: Law Misc, Litigation
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.