Neither Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure nor any other authority lent credence to appellant’s implausible motion requesting that Court of Appeals strike portions of appellee’s brief containing allegedly unsupported assertions of fact; filing of “absurd” motion warranted sanction in form of deduction of twice motion’s length from permissible length of appellant’s reply brief.
Popularity: 9% [?]
Posted on Wednesday, October 11th, 2006. Filed under: Law Misc, Litigation
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Rate This Post - Vote Now!