Typically, in products liability litigation, the product involved in the accident can yield much evidence from a simple visual inspection. But sometimes it is necessary to examine the product, part or component by actually changing its condition in some manner. When the examination goes beyond mere observation and risks or entails changing the condition or appearance of the product — a scenario referred to as “destructive testing” — special considerations arise, according to attorney Michael Hoenig.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Posted on Thursday, August 17th, 2006. Filed under: Law Misc, Litigation
You can
leave a response, or
trackback from your own site.
Typically, in products liability litigation, the product involved in the accident can yield much evidence from a simple visual inspection. But sometimes it is necessary to examine the product, part or component by actually changing its condition in some manner. When the examination goes beyond mere observation and risks or entails changing the condition or appearance of the product — a scenario referred to as “destructive testing” — special considerations arise, according to attorney Michael Hoenig.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Posted on Wednesday, August 16th, 2006. Filed under: In-House Counsel, Law Misc
You can
leave a response, or
trackback from your own site.
Typically, in products liability litigation, the product involved in the accident can yield much evidence from a simple visual inspection. But sometimes it is necessary to examine the product, part or component by actually changing its condition in some manner. When the examination goes beyond mere observation and risks or entails changing the condition or appearance of the product — a scenario referred to as “destructive testing” — special considerations arise, according to attorney Michael Hoenig.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Posted on Wednesday, August 16th, 2006. Filed under: Business Law, Law Misc
You can
leave a response, or
trackback from your own site.