High school student stated claim for defamation where magazine juxtaposed student’s photograph next to article describing teen promiscuity, and where magazine’s small-print disclaimer, explaining that student was not linked to article’s content, could be overlooked by reasonable readers; disclaimer’s wording would not permit conclusion, as matter of law, that article was not of and concerning student.
Popularity: 6% [?]
Posted on Friday, April 7th, 2006. Filed under: Law Misc, Litigation
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Rate This Post - Vote Now!