Price Waterhouse theory of unlawful sex stereotyping would not support male plaintiff’s contention that co-workers engaged in harassment due to perception that plaintiff adopted “female” homosexual role; plaintiff essentially alleged harassment based on perceived homosexuality, not on-the-job appearance or mannerisms; accepting plaintiff’s argument would amend Title VII to adopt sexual orientation as protected class, and thus plaintiff failed to state claim for workplace discrimination.
Popularity: 12% [?]
Posted on Saturday, August 12th, 2006. Filed under: Employment, Law Misc
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



